Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HSC-1 Makedon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HSC-1 Makedon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible sources to confirm existence of this. Whilst not going as far as a deliberate hoax, it does seem to be a fabrication, rather than a real missile. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search turns up 370 hits. Are you sure it doesn't exist? Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google searching for orcs and hobbits turns up even more, but I don't believe in them either.

The problem is the low quality of these sources. I've seen nothing of them which is credible and in depth. I think that there is "a thing" (looking more like a jet model aircraft than anything else) which is the Makedon, but it's not a credible weapon or capable of carrying a useful warhead. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Delete - Google finds a few hits at "Hellenic Stand-off Cruise-1", ~~seems notable~~. Smmurphy^(Talk) 03:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But as Andy Dingley says, none of the hits seem reliable, mostly forums and blogs. Perhaps this was a rumor that wasn't real, perhaps it was a secret project that didn't work, perhaps many things. Who knows? I changed my !vote to delete. Smmurphy^(Talk) 12:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:V; no reliable sources in the article or have been presented at this AfD to confirm that this is not a hoax, and is indeed notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.