Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HKUGA Primary School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HKUGA Primary School[edit]

HKUGA Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Non-notable primary school. SL93 (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Tsang, Ian (2014). 小一入學全攻略 (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Sing Tao News Corporation. pp. 213–215. ISBN 9789623482288. Retrieved 2021-10-11.

      This book devotes three pages to discussing HKUGA Primary School's admissions process, pedagogy, and history.

    2. 李世聰 (2020-06-09). "【小一報名】東區一條龍直資港大同學會小學 6月13日截止申請". Hong Kong Economic Times (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2021-12-12. Retrieved 2021-12-12.

      According to the Hong Kong Economic Times, the HKUGA Primary School is "one of the most sought-after DSS schools".

    3. 李紫銘 (2021-06-01). "小一面試│港同小一每年約6千人申請 校長強調小朋友要有呢樣特質" (in Chinese). HK01. Archived from the original on 2021-12-12. Retrieved 2021-12-12.
    4. 鄺嫻; 黃存新 (2021-11-25). "【校長專訪】受慈父啟發從不將孩子比較 港同校長:要扶持孩子不是踩扁他". Hong Kong Economic Times (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2021-12-12. Retrieved 2021-12-12.
    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow HKUGA Primary School (simplified Chinese: 港大同学会小学; traditional Chinese: 港大同學會小學) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Withdraw: Per the great work by Cunard. SL93 (talk) 23:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.