Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HD 2[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO. The article makes no claim to notability and I could find no coverage that would imply notability. Lithopsian (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails notability per WP:NASTRO. None of the references provide substantial discussion of this star; they are just large data sources. I suspect this article was just made because it's the second entry in the HD catalogue. Was this article deleted before? The comments seem to indicate that. Praemonitus (talk) 22:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was previously deleted by PROD in Decemebr 2012. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. Praemonitus (talk) 01:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I created the article to improve on the previous version, but the information I found does not prove notability for the star. 400Weir (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Easily fails WP:NASTRO. Curbon7 (talk) 07:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.