Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 138573
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge. !voters all state the the topic appears to not meet WP:NASTRO and/or WP:GNG. The merge !voters indicate that a merge should occur. Articles that don't meet Wikipedia guidelines for a standalone article can sometimes be merged into other articles, and this notion is supported in the discussion. Also, the Weak Delete !vote states this as a "borderline case." Since the potential for a merge clearly exists here, a merge discussion can continue on an article talk page. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 07:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
HD 138573[edit]
- HD 138573 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete: a borderline case as a solar analog with appearances in a pair of studies. It's not really enough to pass WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 23:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I cannot see that there are enough substantial writings on the topic. There seems to be 1, but really we need 2 for notability proof. So this means there is not enough for NASTRO, but I would like to see the facts preserved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into an appropriate list article to preserve the information. An individual stub article isn't warranted by WP:GNG or WP:NASTRO. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.