Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. W. Tatum
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
H. W. Tatum[edit]
- H. W. Tatum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE. NW (Talk) 04:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 22:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on sources added. I can't and don't argue that he rises to WP:CREATIVE, but I also can't ignore the amount of coverage that the one statue of Selena has received, not all of which I've included. Color my rationale how you will (a spin on GNG, or just IAR), but this feels notable enough to me. I've teased some of the text out of Google snippets from the Kelso book, which makes it appear that the book has a small section on the statue (2 pages?), but I haven't gotten all of it. (A completely sensible alternative might be to merge to the article on the monument the statue is in.) --joe deckertalk to me 23:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the quantity and quality of sources allow him to pass WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 03:25, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.