Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H.V. Dalling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H.V. Dalling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be notable. Creator of an insignificant invention who has not received any coverage outside of New Brunswick. Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I admit the article is weak when it comes to the notability guidelines, but I think it contains an interesting bit of history, in that it talks about local adoption of the telephone, and its sourced. Keeping individuals who serve as anecdotes about history and the adoption of technology will improve the quality of wikipedia. Monty₈₄₅ 03:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - locally notable, but doesn't meet WikiPedia's guidelines. PK T(alk) 14:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 22:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.