Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H.N. Prasad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H.N. Prasad[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. University professor does not meet the criteria for notability presented at WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cind.amuse 17:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

defer: I suspect this is a valid deletion request (subject is likely non-notable), but the page has been created in the last 24 hours, and it is clear it is still being built. Suggest assuming good faith (WP:AGF) and defer the delete decision one week (March 10th, 2011). Speed8ump (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Welcome back to Wikipedia! No assumptions here. The process in deletion discussions calls for interpretation of guidelines and policy. Since recently returning to the encyclopedia and participating in deletion discussions, it may be advantageous for you to review our deletion policy. You can find it here. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best regards, Cind.amuse 21:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nearly one week passed and the subject remains non-notable.DrPhosphorus (talk) 21:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, run-of-the mill academic, no signs of notability, nowhere near passing WP:PROF. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.