Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H-63 (Michigan county highway)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Bad faith nomination, user is trying to make a point. Speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 23:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H-63 (Michigan county highway)[edit]

Not notable county road. Recommend Deletion. Gamweb (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Nominator is trying to make a point by nominating for deletion. –Fredddie ™ 19:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain what your point is, but perhaps you should Assume Good Faith. Gamweb (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging an article for deletion that was written by someone who tagged an article you worked on is disruptive to the encyclopedia. –Fredddie ™ 23:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Perfectly fine, moderately well-referenced article. older ≠ wiser 20:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose and suggest closure per WP:SNOW—This county road predates the Michigan Highway System as the Sault - Green Bay Trail, a native American Trail linking Green Bay, Wisconsin with Sault Ste. Marie Michigan. Later it was a part of the Mackinac Trail, a name it still carries in addition to the current CDH designation. When it was part of the state trunkline highway system, it was paved as part of US 2. Now is it as part of the Michigan County-Designated Highway System, a system of primary county roads that acts as a secondary highway system in the state, albeit under county maintenance. CDHs carry the same designation across county lines, and those designations are assigned, not by the counties, but by the Michigan Department of Transportation. The nominator of this AfD discussion is likely making a WP:POINT because I have nominated several Florida county roads for deletion or merger. Unlike this road, they do not have any significance outside of their counties, and even that significance is debatable. Imzadi 1979 → 22:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain what your point is, but perhaps you should Assume Good Faith. Gamweb (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging 3 articles (CR 492, H-58, H-63) worked on or created by one editor (Imzadi1979) when asked to comment on 3 AfDs (CR 509, CR 511, CR 516) that were opened by that same editor (Imzadi1979) is disruptive. and WP:POINTy. Imzadi 1979 → 23:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.