Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Håvard Lothe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Håvard Lothe[edit]
- Håvard Lothe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
GNews turns up zilch in English. The cited MySpace account and official website are not enough to establish notability per WP:MUSIC, and his records are with a company which does not have an article on Wikipedia. Tyrenon (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Apparently non-notable. — Bdb484 (talk) 08:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Meets #1 and #2 at WP:MUSICBIO by having charted on a national music chart[1] and by receiving significant coverage in multiple reliable sources[2][3][4]. --JD554 (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps you could add those to the article as well as the AfD? — Bdb484 (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have already added the chart position which is sufficient to show notability per WP:MUSICBIO. That said, WP:BEFORE states: "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD." So even if I hadn't, I have shown that the article could be improved and so it shouldn't be deleted whether I've improved it or not. --JD554 (talk) 20:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps you could add those to the article as well as the AfD? — Bdb484 (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.