Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyrolabe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gyrolabe[edit]

Delete due to WP:N and WP:RS What is notable about this fictional mechanical device? Article is childishly written and has no proper ending...a classic dead end page. It also lacks any reliable sources to prove any inherent notability. Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- unsourced, illucid treatise on an inherently unencyclopedic subject. Reyk _YO! 05:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This article should be a sentence on the page of whatever series it comes from. A new article is not necessary. --Carbonrodney (talk) 07:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Either the article should improve within its been deleted or It should perish. Edeskonline (talk) 13:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Carbonrodney -- Jll (talk) 09:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 21:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unnecessary article about a non-notable fictional topic. Extremely unlikely it will ever move beyond (poor quality) plot summary of the device. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.