Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwyneth Hendriks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. You can find it at Draft:Gwyneth Hendriks.
Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 00:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Gwyneth Hendriks[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gwyneth Hendriks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was created, moved to draftspace, moved out of draftspace by a sockpuppet, PRODded and DEPRODded. She fails WP:FOOTBALL having never played for a team in a WP:FPL or for a senior national team. WP:GNG is also failed due to a lack of multiple sources of significant coverage on her. This isn't enough Dougal18 (talk) 16:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - given that SportsOlympic is a blocked sock, I believe that their inappropriate move from draft space can be reverted. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG & NFOOTBALL. Feel free to move back to draft alternatively. GiantSnowman 18:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Move back to draftspace (preferably) or delete. Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Draftify - potentially might become notable in the near future, I can't see any evidence of currently meeting GNG. The article is a very badly sourced BLP and should never have been moved out of draft space. The fact that this was performed by a bad faith sock makes the situation ten times worse. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.