Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwyddonism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gwyddonism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is non notable quazi-religion. Google search returns just 6 hits ([1]), all of them some internet forums and so, no reliable sources. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Apparently lacks entirely reliable sources.--cyclopia ^speak! 16:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - tiny sect; stub can't be sourced. Bearian (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability not established.--Staberinde (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, Book of the art and the craft not found anywhere. Apparently he either published it late in life after 1986, or he failed to file a copyright copy with LC. --Bejnar (talk) 21:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.