Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guys Gone Wild (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Girls Gone Wild (franchise)#Guys Gone Wild. Michig (talk) 08:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guys Gone Wild[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was kept at the first AfD, but I think, seven years on, we should revisit this article. There are a handful of reliable sources available, but all were in the context of the initial release of this series. As a general rule under WP:GNG a limited amount of coverage in conjunction with a product release generally does not satisfy WP:GNG. Does not appear to be any coverage at all subsequent to the initial release. Additionally, does not come close to satisfying any of the specific notability guidelines, such as WP:NFILMS. I declined PROD on procedural grounds, but I think this clearly should be deleted with no merge. Safiel (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnotable and because the requirement of clean-up from the 1st afd was not done in seven years. As the PRODer I might change my mind if the article improves in the coming days. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 04:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just merge into Girls Gone Wild. 'Nuff said. Snowager (talk) 05:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article as it is clearly isn't notable thus no reason to keep it. -- fdewaele, 28 December 2014, 23:49 CET.
Comment: If this article gets deleted, why not we Redirect it to Girls Gone Wild instead? Snowager (talk) 06:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Girls Gone Wild - just a variation. Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Girls Gone Wild (franchise)#Guys Gone Wild section in particular. It averts ambiguity. --Mr. Guye (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I specifically object to a merge unless we include a redirect to the specific section that I already put forth. The proposals to merge so far do not include that part. We don't need ambiguity. No one needs it. --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Girls Gone Wild (franchise)#Guys Gone Wild. The only significant coverage I've found is an AP piece that several papers published ([1]). NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the section described by Northameric1000 above.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 07:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.