Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy A.S. Wingate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guy A.S. Wingate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully it can now be resolved. Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing in the article seems particularly notable, I couldn't find the in-depth sources about him needed for WP:GNG, and I couldn't find reviews of his books on pharmaceutical computer systems verification (nor the ones on Scottish coalminer genealogy) that would help him pass WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete has a few links to social networking sites, but not much for passing GNG. Noteswork (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Books actually found a few minor mentions but aside from that, absolutely nothing. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.