Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustaw Marek Brzezin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gustaw Marek Brzezin[edit]

Gustaw Marek Brzezin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't been able to find evidence of notability, but I'm no expert here as the sources are not in English. If he didn't win any election, then he can't be a notable politician.

Polish sources mention him, someone who could read Polish can comment. Marvellous Spider-Man 14:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as a Voivodeship marshal, Brzezin meets WP:POLITICIAN, btw, here is a recent article stating him still in that position opening an airport - [1], also meets WP:ANYBIO as a recipient of the Gold Cross of Merit - [2]. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep We do need better and more sources, but as the head of a top level sub-division of Poland Brzezin clearly passes the notability guidelines for politicians. Probably all members of Voivodeship leadership do, and more so the executive council, but the Marshal clearly without question does.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.