Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Tormena

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Tormena[edit]

Gustavo Tormena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about footballer who has only played semi-professionally except for one Belgian first division match. There is nearly no online Portuguese- or Flemish-language coverage of this footballer other than database entries (and nothing at all which would be in-depth coverage except an article about his famous footballing family - of which he is clearly the least accomplished). Although having played in one Belgian first division match creates a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL, there is a long-standing consensus that when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG as this does, the presumption isn't valid. Jogurney (talk) 17:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG, far more important than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG comprehensively I'm afraid Spiderone 21:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.