Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunnsteinn Ólafsson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnsteinn Ólafsson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage on his career to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN. Perhaps I'm missing something due to the language barrier, but I cannot find any WP:RS covering him. – DarkGlow • 13:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 13:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 13:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 13:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in the Icelandic media.[1][2][3][4][5][6]. Alvaldi (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources shared above establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 19:24, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it meets WP:GNG --—— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – articles with sources that are almost exclusively in relatively obscure languages like Islandic are often a little hard to judge, but the links that Alvadi has been kind enough to supply above do convince me that keeping the article in question wouldn't be a misinterpretation of our guidelines, even if I have to rely on machine translations to assess them. Given that this is all but certainly an autobiography, it may need some further clean-up, but I think we're generally in the clear. AngryHarpy‍^talk 19:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.