Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulls Way

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gulls Way[edit]

This is a minor suburban street and is not notable, despite its connection with Rupert Hamer. Grahame (talk) 07:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 07:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -- nn street. - Longhair\^talk 15:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article of this kind could be written about every street in every town and city in the world. The article identifies nothing notable about the street. The fact that a former premier of Victoria lived in the street as a child does not constitute notability for the street. The article is based on numerous claims but none of them is verified by a reference or in-line citation. Dolphin51 (talk) 23:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I seriously doubt this is WP:50k-worthy. Grutness...wha? 01:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article seems to be about both a beach and a road so should probably be two articles. That said neither appears to be notable so delete. Dpmuk (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - possibly some kind of promotional exercise.--Lester 21:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.