Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilty of being delicious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guilty of being delicious[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the general notability guideline or the notability guideline for web content. – hysteria18 (talk) 12:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unremarkable tattoo design, sources seem to be gossip sites, which aren't generably reliable. S_peakF_ree ^(talk)_(contribs) 17:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's nothing out there that shows that this tattoo is notable or that it's even that big of a meme. I'd also like to note that the major contributor to the article is the creator/owner of the tattoo and with the borderline promotional and non-neutral tone of the article, it'd need a complete re-write even if there were sources. Which there aren't, none that would show notability, anyway.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.