Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo Gonzalez (CSC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 01:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guillermo Gonzalez (CSC)[edit]

Although this subject appears real and is not likely to be vanity, the article doesn't assert any real notability of the subject. I am inclined to say Delete it, as it is not likely to progress from a stub, ever, unless the subject performs something much more notable than he has to date. Bobby1011 15:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would vote to delete it but the owners of the Intelligent design article will come in here and astroturf it --Ruby 15:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of few professors arguing in favor of intelligent design. Significant figure in the debate. There is a fair amount of press coverage on this guy. (Please do not confuse my 'keep' vote as an endorsement of ID.) Monkeyman 15:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ok, I would accept the explanation given by Monkeyman, but it speaks for itself that the article will have to make reference to his sigificance. I have certainly never heared of him, though to be fair, I don't really follow the ID vs. Evolution/Bigbang debate. Bobby1011 16:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Monkeyman -- S iva1979^{Talk to me} 16:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly notable [1]. Monicasdude 16:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep King aardvark 19:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC) I started this thing, sorry I just threw up a single line to start the page. Too busy to do anything else. He is notable in the ID argument. He lectures frequently, and some of his ideas are not strictly ID per se, and have been in Scientific American. I certainly don't like ID, but it's an important issue and should have all the info available. Unfortunately, I really don't have the time to do any more on this[reply]
Keep Major figure on the ID side. JoshuaZ 06:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.