Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillaume Hubert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article can be restored if circumstances change (i.e. if he actually gets minutes in a pro league). ‑Scottywong | spout _ 18:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guillaume Hubert[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league Wgolf (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - he's been the back-up keeper on the bench in the last 9 matches for Standard Liège. As such, he will make an appearance sooner or later, meeting WP:GNG; as this is almost-certain, WP:CRYSTAL is not applicable. The danger of simply deleting, is that it will likely be recreated rather than restored, wasting editing time, and leading to a missing history, that is seldom restored in a timely fashion. In lieu of deletion, perhaps moving to draft space would be a better option. Nfitz (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.