Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GuildWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Guild Wars, as was already done by User:Stormie. - Bobet 10:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GuildWiki[edit]

Contested prod. Article does not assert how this wiki is notable. Fails WP:WEB... Google test ignoring "forum/s and wikipedia" gives 261 hits. [1] --Kunzite 05:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. tmopkisn ^tlka 06:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. By this criteria I believe wowwiki would be deleted as well. --ColourBurst 08:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - nominate wowwiki for afd and see. Tychocat 10:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameWikis. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri @ 09:35, July 8, 2006
Delete per nom. A wiki just for one game? The front page looks more like social networking. Good luck on that. Tychocat 10:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Guild Wars. It might be worth a mention, but not an article. - Che Nuevara: ^{Join the Revolution} 13:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: there is already a mention of guild wiki in Guild Wars#External links. What more needs to be said? What more can be said? — Kaustuv Chaudhuri @ 20:58, July 8, 2006
Merge per CheNuevara... it looks like it could be an interesting little paragraph but there's no way it's notable enough at the moment to merit its own page. --Vengeful Cynic 15:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete withotu prejudice to a brief mention in Guild Wars. No merge necessary, I'd say, since it would only be a very brief mention. Just zis Guy you know? 21:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete website promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Notability not established. 68.50.203.109 08:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - ColourBurst and Tychocat make very good points. WoWwikis been around for a while, too? 69.124.143.230 00:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Comparing two similar (by kind) sites, WoWWiki and FFXIclopedia, both have survived AfDs (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WoWWiki and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FFXIclopedia), with the latter barely squeaking through. GuildWiki has already been deleted once when it was called GameWikis (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameWikis) with near unanimous consensus. Same as now. This article should technically qualify for CSD A1 and G4, but it's past the speedy-by date. Both WoWWiki and FFXIclopedia are vastly bigger wikis than GuildWiki (12k[2] and 13k[3] pages respectively vs. 8k[4] for GuildWiki). However, if you compare Alexa data, WoWWiki(5,667) and GuildWiki(6,475) are vastly superior to FFXIclopedia(46,062). Summary: it's hard to find a sound precedent in this case. I do think it's worth noting that the creator of this article, User:DragonWR12LB, is a member of GuildWiki[5]: there is a clear conflict of interest. If this article gets deleted, it might be worth revisiting the notability question for WoWWiki. 137.226.13.2 04:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WARNING: the above comment by 137.226.13.2 (talk · contribs · block log) is a violation of WP:NOP (do a reverse lookup). — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 04:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Notable or not, there is nothing here that can't be in the Guild Wars article. --Aguerriero (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.