Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guido (jazz band) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that this is a clear fail of WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guido (jazz band)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability, not enough available sources for an article of substance Vmavanti (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Vmavanti (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Good stub. Not promotion, band not notable for more. Cheerio042 (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Blocked sock. Britishfinance (talk) 09:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. Not being promotional is a low bar, there's no substantive coverage. Reywas92^Talk 20:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - still run of the mill, and no reliable sources, even 13 years later. Bearian (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.