Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guidelines to investment in gold and silver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines to investment in gold and silver[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not asserted; I believe this book isn't notable in any case. Yamla (talk) 13:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Note that I think the page could probably be speedily deleted, but the author of the page removed the PROD, so let's jump through the hoops here. --Yamla (talk) 13:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and do it swiftly. Thinly veiled advertising, no claim or indication of significance, much less notability. TimothyJosephWood 14:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This reads more like one reader's notes than advertising of the book. I see nothing to establish that the book is notable. In addition though, the current text is non-encyclopaedic, questionable and in poor English, which factors combine to suggest that WP:TNT is appropriate. AllyD (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note also that a draft was rejected yesterday, with the user directed to the notability criteria for books and the need for references. AllyD (talk) 15:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:TNT, this doesn't even assert significance/notability of any sort. GAB^gab 23:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.