Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gui4Cli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gui4Cli[edit]

Previously prodded by another user with "No evidence of notability" as reason, deprodded by someone with no rationale given. There are no reliable sources given, it's freeware software and basically just advertising/self-promotion. DreamGuy (talk) 15:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Written like an advert, no good sources to show notability. Looking at it just as a product, the software doesn't seem especially unique/interesting. (Full disclosure: I was the prodder) --Cybercobra (talk) 21:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - for the above reasons, poorly sourced, sounds promotional, subject seems to lack notability. --Mysidia (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shameless wikiadvertising. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing notability out there... one or two blog posts. Amiga freeware of pretty limited interest. Gigs (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, advert. JJL (talk) 02:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.