Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guaranteed to Disagree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 12:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guaranteed to Disagree[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. No reliable secondary sources. Per comments made by a new user when the PROD was removed, remember that while the band itself may be notable, notability is not WP:INHERITED. Grayfell (talk) 19:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Band is very notable they have quite the following there concerts are always packed. This EP has the significance of been there first music released if its not significant does that mean there other two albums are not one of which I might add made the UK number 1 on the alternative charts. I am sure there is plenty of information on the net that can be used for sources on this but I question if the person nominating this articles removal has had a look for any. Daniel298289 (talk) 08:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't speak for the nom, but I have. There aren't any reliable sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. What I found was a handful--- and only a handful--- of hits where the album is mentioned in passing, on blogsites yet, and that doesn't cut it. The band may be notable, maybe, but we're not talking about the band here. Nha Trang ^Allons! 21:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I found that the EP debuted on Billboard's Heatseeker albums chart at #38 and reentered at #46. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.