Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groove State
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Groove State[edit]
- Groove State (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claims charting but these are not good national charts. Nothing else to indicate notability. Article appears to be created by their label. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, some fleeting claims to notability, but not enough I feel. Chart positions are on minor genre charts, not national charts as demanded by criteria #2 of WP:MUSIC, and I'm not seeing how they could meet any other criteria there. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Weak Keep. Appear to have received some coverage, having been played on Rage, and an Australian dance radio chart appearance isn't too insignificant. Esteffect (talk) 01:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.