Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groove Stain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Groove Stain[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Band whose notability is asserted but not established by third-party reliable sources. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 00:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 04:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't find significant coverage either, just a few notices of gigs in the news. Although I did like this line from the article: "it became evident that some of the performing members were more serious about pursuing the band as a career than others. Patterson and Hatton went to sharpen their music education at the Atlanta Institute of Music, while Pope and Etheridge attended the University of West Georgia." Oh, snap! Glenfarclas (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.