Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grinder price

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grinder price[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable term, apparently confined to a single Internet forum. No coverage in reliable sources. Contested PROD. Acroterion (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - this is my first attempt at a proper entry... I'm collecting all the source information at the moment, and getting ready to do further formatting on the entry... I'm sure I've messed up here - I thought the page would remain 'offline' until it was ready! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrettMRC (talk • contribs) 22 March 2011

Someone can certainly userfy this article (i.e., place it into a "offline" state for you to work on it); however, judging from the content, even if this is done, there is a strong chance that if/when you do move it back into mainspace (i.e., an "online" state) this page will end up right back here, at a deletion discussion. For more information as to why this content is not acceptable, see WP:NEO. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as a neologism that has not taken root. -- Whpq (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of reliable sources. Search turns up nothing. - Mailer Diablo 20:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.