Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimvenom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grimvenom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although there's a claim of importance here (radio airplay), a google search for this artist, the single, or his record company doesn't come up with independent, reliable sources that show notability. Prod contested by IP editor without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing on google news, nothing on blogs, indeed less than 800 google hits total. Perhaps up and coming, but clearly not notable now, and just one of thousands of other young hip-hop artists who hope to make it but have not yet done so. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 21:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 01:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 10:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.