Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffith Central

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Griffith Central[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for 8 years. Fails WP:GNG. 45 stores is very small shopping centre. WP:PROD declined because an IP removed it (ten years ago) without citing a reason Ajf773 (talk) 09:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete Unreferenced and very small at 45 stores. Consensus has shown these very small centres are deleted. LibStar (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.