Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gremlins 3 (not yet released)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gremlins 3 (not yet released)[edit]
- Gremlins 3 (not yet released) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, not MOS, potential BLP problems Jasper Deng (talk) 21:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. This future film not only has not been released, it hasn't even been filmed ... or hired a director and cast yet ... or even finished being written, according to this article. As-yet-unreleased films normally should not have articles until they begin principal photography. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE Bad article writing, no sourcing, on a non-encyclopedic topic that discusses possible future event that has no significant importance, i lost count but i think thats 5 reasons any 2 of which (sometimes less) would be grounds for deletion in my opinion alone Moneya (talk) 22:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, violates WP:V. --Kinu t/c 22:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.