Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg W. Locke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greg W. Locke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a puff piece. The article's subject doesn't appear to meet WP:N or WP:BIO as he hasn't received significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources, nor has he had a defining impact in his profession. Them From Space 20:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find secondary published sources on this individual. All web hits are from social media and other self-generated sites. Notability is not established. -Uyvsdi (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
Delete. Pure, unsupported vanity, with numerous links being sprinkled throughout Wikipedia. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 03:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Just to make any incoming editors aware, I cleaned out the worst of the puffery and unsourced content, so the current version is dramatically different from the previous version. No opinion as of yet about notability, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete compete non-entity. The only Ghits I get for Fort Wayne Reader, that the article cites exclusively, are directory entries. This leads me to the inevitable conclusion that the alleged journal is a micro-publication or self-publication Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 10:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.