Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Siegele

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. – Joe (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Siegele[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. The links provided do not meet WP:SIGCOV. One of the cited sources from ABC Australia might have been SIGCOV but it's a dead link. LibStar (talk) 06:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the link is archived here. That said, Redirect to Ratbag Games. Not independently notable. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 07:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Video games, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sigcov in these sources:

The Advertiser (not the most reliable name, I know): [1][2] [3] and many more.

Weekend Australian: [4]

The Sydney Morning Herald: [5]

The Sunday Mail: [6] (more about his company securing a contract)

He also has dozens of passing mentions or minor quotes in news articles regarding his company RatBag. I think all these combined establish notability. Merko (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Merko Jack4576 (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources Merko found; passes WP:BASIC. Also found a book source that dedicates a chapter to him and how he formed Ratbag Games. PantheonRadiance (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.