Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Hogan

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Hogan[edit]

Two month old article about long-forgotten news event. Clearly no longer notable. Daniel Case 01:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There are bank robbery stories on the news every day. This one is no more notorious than those. --Kinu 01:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable criminal. Cnwb 03:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Class president robs a bank with another student driving the getaway car is highly unusual. -- JJay 03:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per Daniel Case. -- Kjkolb 04:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The "famous" claim is a bit to big. As Kinu said, there are bank robberies all the time. Maybe a keep if the story was on wikinews, but not for Wikipedia. --lightdarkness (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No more notable than any other bank robbery. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 04:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nn bank robber per nom.Blnguyen 05:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not encyclopedia material. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable criminal. --Siva1979Talk to me 08:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per JJay Jcuk 08:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unusual does not automatically mean notable. JIP | Talk 09:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleteper nom. Logophile 10:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and file under "who cares?" Local notability but not even close to supporting a wikipedia article.--Isotope23 21:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Karnesky 22:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per JJay. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable enough Avi 18:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as being much more notable than other bank robbers - how many get their own MSNBC article? Turnstep 13:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per above - Hahnchen 14:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Greg_Hogan&oldid=1137890402"