Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenshirts (G.I. Joe)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liberty to merge if desired. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greenshirts (G.I. Joe)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely WP:OR and plot summary; citations merely verify appearance, and do nothing to assert real-world notability. --EEMIV (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not really a characxter, just a generic term for the unnamed extra background sodiers. Unsurprisingly, "sourced" to comic books. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no, many greenshirts are named. Lots42 (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Prominent plot point in Joe comics and cartoons. Lots42 (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lots42, or merge to G.I. Joe (comics)#Devil's Due Publishing. BOZ (talk) 03:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge per BOZ. OR is a content issue, not a reason for deletion. If we need more sources, here is one for starters. --Cerebellum (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.