Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute[edit]

Contested speedy. Non notable building and course description that belongs in a student guide. Little, if anything, worth merging to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute article.

Also including Pittsburgh Building

Nuttah68 07:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom unless a more objective version (without the cutesy quotations from students in the former case) can be written in order to demonstrate notability. Looking at the articles currently, I don't believe that will be the case, but I'm happy to be proven wrong. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as individual campus buildings are not usually notable. These aren't even on the National Register of Historic Places. --Dhartung | Talk 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete individual buildings tend not to be notable, especially without placement on the National Register of Historic Places.-- danntm ^T _C 18:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this is one of a series of articles mixing archtectural details and faculty minutiae. I suggest they be merged into one for the buildings with the faculty stuff stipped away. -- Beardo 00:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as far as I can see from the articles, the buildings are no more notable than the course details. Nuttah68 09:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While it's a cool building, I agree it's not particularly notable beyond RPI. I was surprised to see even a page on it. I made some corrections earlier and cleaned it up a little, but I'm still not sure it's WP material. Same with the other campus buildings listed Alec 20:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These buildings, both today and in the past, are host to symposiums and other academic meetings which are attended by people from around the world. I would agree that an entry on a dormitory is worthless in the context of WP, but these buildings are of interest to those outside the school's community.

Delete Inadequate evidence of notability and importance. Edison 19:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.