Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green slime (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Green slime (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable fictional creature. The only non-primary sources here are all being used in the "Creative Origins" section, which is entirely WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH, as the sources in question not only do not discuss D&D, they also predate the game by a century or more. Even if that section wasn't just entirely original research, noting the creatures origins do nothing to establish notability without reliable secondary sources actually discussing the creature, and there are none. Rorshacma (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable gamecruft._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Would it be possible to merge this with Dungeons and Dragons? Vorbee (talk) 09:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 11:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Completely non-notable. There is nothing to merge. TTN (talk) 13:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no significant coverage in secondary sources. Not a very active user (talk) 06:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.