Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Legislative Assembly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tamilnadu Government Multi Super Speciality Hospital. (non-admin closure) --Mdann52talk to me! 07:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Green Legislative Assembly[edit]

Green Legislative Assembly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any sources that would attest that "Green Legislative Assembly" is anything more than a brief marketing hype for a new public building that takes advantage of sunlight. Would have nominated it for merger into Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly but it has too much WP:NPOV to be useful. ELEKHHT 08:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ELEKHHT 10:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ELEKHHT 10:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  00:23, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Could have sworn that buildings are almost an auto-Keep at Wikipedia. Take for example Plas Newydd, an article I worked on recently. If not for the three sources I added about a heat pump being installed in it, the entire article would still be sourced by the National Trust, which owns the property. Not exactly an independent source. But no one cares. Buildings are here to stay, they gather publicity over the years like moss, and their existence is empirically observable like nothing else but rivers highways and mountains. So what is your beef with this building, exactly? As for merger, let me refer you to the articles Ohio Legislature and Ohio Statehouse. It is not merely acceptable to have both legislature and building articles, but customary. Anarchangel (talk) 05:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. As you'll see from that article, and the various articles to which it links, the location of the Legislative Assembly for that state is in a degree of flux, and this is reflected in our own coverage, which needs a substantial re-write (starting with Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex). Ultimately this re-write should probably lead to the creation of an article titled "Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Building", but it would probably be wise to wait until they've finished building it, and have definitely decided that this is where the Assembly plans to settle. Given that they haven't even managed to complete the building's dome properly yet, an article right now would be premature. The green credentials of the building are mildly interesting, but since virtually every new building these days makes similar claims they're certainly not notable per se. The building certainly doesn't have "Green" in its name, so the article title here is misleading. So let's put the useful information in the "Location" section of Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly for now. RomanSpa (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Politics alert: We have a more current article on this building and it is Tamilnadu Government Multi Super Speciality Hospital. Wait, what? Well, when the government changed hands, the new people in power didn't like the idea of this being the assembly, so it's been converted to a hospital now. A redirect should be good, as it's a very likely search term, but all the necessary content about the conversion from assembly to hospital is in the hospital article. That article started as an article for the assembly building and morphed into its current state over time. —SpacemanSpiff 17:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.