Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green House (electronics company)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Green House (electronics company)[edit]

Green House (electronics company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. Refs 3 and 5 are brief notices, Ref 4 is a mention among other companies in the project. Ref 1 & 2 are from the company itself. DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just created the article of Green House (electronics company). I displayed the company information as possible on an impartial ground. Generally, I think Green House notability in the world is not high, it is just limited in computer industry of Japan. However I think its notability is equal to Elecom, I-O Data, and Buffalo of Japanese company, these are not like Sony. On the other hand, I think the need of article of Green House, because the company has contributed to the computer industry for many years, especially in Japan.
- Yokohama2010 (Talk) 00:50, 08 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
People in other countries except Japan may not understand Green House notability in Japan. So I put photo on the article, then you may imagine its notability in Japan.
- Yokohama2010 (Talk) 00:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete- Lack of third party information. Two sources cited are from the subject company. --SamHolt6 (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment are there any WP:RS to be found in Japanese its Japanese name 株式会社グリーンハウス? @Yokohama2010: Do you have any Japanese-language WP:RS discussing this company that establish its notability? - GretLomborg (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - A search of Japanese sources was not easy because there are several other companies called Green House in Japan. Searching for "Green House" with related terms like 機器 and IoT helps a bit, but what I mostly find are announcements about job openings. For news articles, most of what I find are articles announcing the release of individual products ([1], [2], [3], etc.) or of the creation of IoT or other networks where Green House is just mentioned in a long list of other companies ([4], [5], [6], etc.). I am just not finding any independent RS which talk about the company itself, enough to verify the details of the article. Michitaro (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. There aren't sufficient references that meet the guidelines for establishing notability. -- HighKing++ 11:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.