Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Completions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Green Completions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like an essay/personal research complete with non-neutral tone (particularly: Arguably the most important benefit from green completions is the positive environmental impact. No flaring and venting practically eliminate emissions during the completions process in natural gas wells. This not only improves the image of our industry, but also provides sustainable operations for future development of our industry.) It also seems to be copy and pasted from somewhere, though I can't find the source.

The topic itself is probably notable or encyclopedic enough but as the article stands now, it needs to be blown up and rewritten. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree regarding notability being (just about!) there, but yes WP:BLOWITUP is a good description of what needs to happen here to get it into an encyclopedic state! Mike1901 (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctantly, delete and have a fresh go. Seems like a notable topic, but the current language requires complete gutting of the caboose here - I don't think a reworking of present text will be enough.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.