Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenEvo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GreenEvo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by the creator with the following edit summary: "reliable information and secondary sources added". I am afraid I still don't see the references ans sufficient. Let's discuss. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We have already discussed it with Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus on Polish Wikipedia and article was approved and NOT deleted there. There are external links in the article and they are independent from government (which I believe was the main concern of Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus)- these are Polish Press Agency and other Polish media (like New Industry Portal www.wnp.pl)--Dariusz Szwed (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Wikipedia is pretty inclusionist, doesn't have a detailed notability policy, and IIRC, that discussion had only the two of us disagreeing with one another. I stand by my opinion that this project has generated only passing coverage, and the rest is primarily self-published or press release like. There is a single story from PAP that seems based on PR materials that got shared to few Polish newspapers, that's it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My points in PL Wikipedia were considered relevant - the article is there, not deleted. In my opinion (and my experience of editing here and there) English Wikipedia is more inclusive :) Greenevo is objectively an existing, governmental project with media coverage. And please Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus, look at the sources in the EN article again. You already had that point in PL discussion that Polish media "paste and copy" Ministry's press releases which means they are not reliable. I suppose we are not going to discuss quality of Polish independent media here (which is of course as in many countries - sometimes higher and sometimes lower and you can read more about it here: Freedom of the Press (report)). It is not the subject for deleting an article from Wikipedia. Public TV channel - TV INFO, Polish Press Agency PAP or New Industry WNP.PL to mention a few are NOT "governmental" media :).--Dariusz Szwed (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 22:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.