Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great escape remake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as admitted hoax vandalism, per this edit by Brucewillisrocks001 (talk · contribs), the article's creator. Uncle G 22:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Great escape remake

WP:NOT a crystal ball. There is no IMDB entry for this film to indicate it is even in production. My quick sampling of search results with Bruce Willis and 2008 included reveals no appropriate sources. Erechtheus 04:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Speedy Delete' per creator's comment below. Hoax, possibly an attempt at wish fullfillment. I enjoyed the article creator's trumpeting of the First Amendment as a reason to remove the prod - Richfife 05:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless and until there's proof that it's in production. Somehow, I'm not convinced by the US Constitution's "right to write about made-up movies". BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 06:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC) i totally have a right to make up movies... if i dont, call the cops on me dude, i'll take them on at checkers, as well
• Delete as above. Load of bollocks. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 08:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. Ramsquire 20:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per the above and the below. —Whomp ^(myedits) 21:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

so heres how it is.

i made this up

and thats not a bad thing

in fact

i know several people who are incredibly angry at bruce willis and the director of Torque for having such a bad idea

i dont know if theyre still buying it. but if they are

please find it in your hearts to keep this up for atleast two or three more days

but yeah, the first ammendment thing was a joke

so dont make me out to be some lame ass clown that uses bill of rights as an excuse to buy an assault rifle

no, im much more partial to bolt action rifles myself

if you got a problem with this then come to my house (i live in rhode island near providence, i will give you the info later if you wanna go)

but seriously. come over

i will school you in a game of checkers, and you will shamefully walk out my door and back to wherever you came from

but if you do win, which i doubt will happen cuz i totally own at checkers (seriously with in the first like three turns i already have like eight kings and your gonna be like woah howd he get all those friggin kings???), i will totally take down the article

hakuna matata,

jakke

ps. i'm still waiting for some loser to correct me for saying colonol hilts instead of captain hiltz

pps. the original great escape is way better than the new one, believe me, i've read the script for this one and that excerpt is about as cool as it gets the rest is just talk scenes and bruce willis doesnt even take his clothes off

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.