Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Learning (company)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great Learning (company)[edit]

Great Learning (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article with sources based on press releases[1][2][3]. The article was previously deleted through AFD and it yet fails WP:ORGCRIT. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Notability not established- despite the WP:REFBOMB, it appears to be a typical education software company going about its business. Quite an example of name-dropping in the article! 1292simon (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Since the previous AfD the company has been involved in announcing various initiatives, a brand ambassador, and received a start-up award in its field, but I am not seeing the evidence of attained notability needed to overturn the May 2019 AfD consensus. AllyD (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.