Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Fox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Core desat 05:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Fox[edit]

This is a gameplay element that does not have real world information to establish notability. The specifics are covered within the various articles (though a small section under List of characters in the Star Fox series#Star Fox team may be warranted), and there is no current assertion for improvement. TTN (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, nomination in bad taste Okay, now you're just disrupting wikipedia to make a point, whatever point that is. From your actions, I'm assuming you're intent on deleting whatever Star Fox-related articles there are, as you've nominated MULTIPLE Star Fox articles for deletion. I don't know why you have such a bias against Star Fox-related articles. Saying they're not notable or have no "real world information" are not an excuses or reasons. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 22:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, nomination in bad taste You have been recently nominating A lot of video game related articles, some I actually agree with, but most of them I see as bad taste. You suggested a merge for King DeDeDe, but despite major opposition with very little support, you carry through. I had prepared to introduce some more resources today and found that you decided to carry through anyway. Blood dripping on the ground 22:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. TTN (talk) 23:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per RingtailedFox. The JPS ^{talk to me} 23:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete regardless of any bad faith, this article needs to be terminated (per WP:GAMECRUFT). User:Krator (t c) 00:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If you guys don't plan on adding Real-world info to the articles, then there's no reason they should exist. It's the rules. -- ZeroGiga 00:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete See WP:FICT (or the more stable WP:N) - articles on fiction need reliable, secondary sources. I don't see any of that, and articles that are derived solely from the original fictional work can only restate the plot or engage in original research. --Phirazo 04:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, gameguide, has no sources for real-world notability. An editor who nominates a lot of unsourced gameguide articles for deletion should be praised, not accused of disruption. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 05:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep unless some suitable merge target can be found. Too long to be included in the main 'Star Fox' article. Might go in a 'List of Star Fox ships' if there is such a thing, but otherwise fine where it is. Wikipedia is not paper. We have room to organize articles in a logical manner rather than cramming everything onto one page. Nom seems like WP:POINT. Et cetera - same issues as the other dozen articles. --CBD 06:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's too long because it's full of in-universe, gameguide, unencyclopedic "information". Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 07:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:GAMECRUFT. --Jack Merridew 11:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I have noticed that you have been posting links within his talk page. Your comments and posts are similar too. I think your accounts are connected some way. Blood dripping on the ground 18:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - AGF, Bdotg. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Game guide cruft. Eusebeus (talk) 15:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete- This article is pure gamecruf, completely failing WP:RS, this should not have been brought back in the first place. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article wholly lacking any reliably sourced claims to real-world notability. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Change to merge - This article should be merged with a Starfox location page or Starfox series page. 68.60.62.128 (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging the data doesn't confer notability to the subject, nor alleviate the need for reliable sources. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 21:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - just a recitation of in-game information. No information to show notability outside of the game itself. -- Whpq (talk) 17:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.