Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Stevens (doctor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Stevens (doctor)[edit]

Unclear if this doc meets the wp:bio/wp:prof notability standard. The article is also a bit too spammy. The input of other editors would be appreciated. Thanks, brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see how this biography meets any of the notability guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
uncertain 27 Peer-reviewed papers in scopus, highest counts 30, 12, 11. Possible a notable surgeon, but borderline. Many of the papers are in good journals and report very long series of cases. It is possible that he's notable in the specialty; however, most of the MD articles submitted to Wikipedia are from cosmetic and plastic surgeons; this is a specialty that depends very heavily on advertising, and therefore I tend to have a rather critical attitude towards these articles. But this is a better real publication record than most such here. DGG (talk) 05:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advertisement, probably written by a marketing firm. Narayanese (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete per WP:ADVERT and, IMHO, a failure to meet WP:BIO and WP:PROF has mentioned by OP. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 09:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dr Stevens does not meet the WP:BIO criteria. He has several publications, but he does not have significant coverage about him in any secondary source. Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ad. Citation for fame refers to own clinic. Kevin McCready (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.