Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grannie (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grannie (band)[edit]

Author has now added this non-trivial mention. I don't believe that one review of an album counts as meeting WP:GNG though. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. I can't find any reliable sources talking about it. All I could find on Google were blogspot blogs. The standard.co.uk reference in the article does not mention the band. The author appears to cite it to back up the claim that the music venues that allegedly played at were "iconic", not that they actually played at them. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:GNG and WP:BAND both look for more notability than the sources, chiefly concerned with record values, should indicate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as absolutely no actual significance or substance for our policies. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.