Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Theft Auto V soundtrack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dysklyver 23:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto V soundtrack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, article-long tracklist. Zero notability. Should be deleted or reditect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V. Lordtobi (✉) 06:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Music of Grand Theft Auto V per nom. Article is fancruft—it belongs on the GTA Wiki, not Wikipedia. The only useful sections ("Production" and "Merchandise") already exist on the target article, and are written better there. – Rhain ☔ 07:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. Understandable in its current status, and after seeing Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grand Theft Auto V soundtrack/archive1 and the articles at Template:Grand Theft Auto V it is clear someone is trying to get this to WP:FT. Nonetheless, deleting or simply redirecting is not the solution. Yes, this article is mere fancruft, no, it is not a reason to delete. When I was writing Old Love / New Love I found information about the in-game radio station Radio Mirror Park, none of that is here and none of that is in Music of Grand Theft Auto V, the same applies to all radio station. So, unless MGTAV will be discussing information about all the radio stations + information of all the 3 released.CDs there is no reason to have this gone. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 07:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'll agree the long list of tracks seems like cruft. There are, however, multiple RSs talking about the subject. I'm not sure how you can say the subject doesn't pass GNG. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Plenty of RS for this. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect. I don't really care about the direction a merge occurs, but there is almost 0 reason to have a separate "soundtrack" and "music" article. Seeing as the list in this article strikes me as fancruft, the rest of the information sourced to WP:RS in this article could reasonably be merged into the music article. --151.165.212.38 (talk) 15:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well sourced. It could do with trimming but I feel meets general guidelines to maintain separate article status. Rusted AutoParts 17:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with those above - This list needs improvement, as it reads badly; but not worth a complete deletion. Lee Vilenski(talk) 14:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - subject appears to meet WP:GNG with coverage in multiple sources. gongshow talk 08:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.