Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Orient de Suisse

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 August 23.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Orient de Suisse[edit]

NN Masonic group with no way to assert notability (or prove existence, for that matter). There are no objective sources, and the organization's homepage (which was the only source for the article) is nothing but a graphic, title, and contact address. This is not, by the way, the more well-known Grand Lodge Alpina of Switzerland for which there are sources available. MSJapan (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails verifiability with no reliable and independent sources. Edison (talk) 02:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete No verifiability or reliable sources. Are there more of these unsourced free mason articles on Wikipedia? Artene50 (talk) 09:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: If you go by the name of the organization, it seems at first glance to meet the "national in scope" criteria of WP:ORG, but without sources there is no way to know if this is in fact the case. It could be five guys meeting in Geneva, or thousands of Masons, in multiple lodges, meeting all over Switzerland. You can not go by a name. In any case, the article needs reliable third party sources to establish its notability.Blueboar (talk) 13:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—No claim to notability. Livitup (talk) 17:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.