Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granada High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Granada High School[edit]

Completing AfD for Kdepa Metros232 03:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable, though I wonder why I bother. --InShaneee 03:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Probably delete as non-notable. --Jadriaen 03:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, WP:SCHOOL, inherently notable, yada yada ... -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 03:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "This proposal was rejected by the community. It is inactive but retained for historical interest." - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Just saying that I approve of inherent notability -- Samir (the scope) धर्म
    - Then say that. Don't cite a rejected policy. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Non-policy shortcuts are cited all the time. Many people believe that schools are inherently notable and will still refer to the shortcut as a succinct form of their argument. -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 04:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Cool, does that mean I can start citing <link removed> as a succinct form of my argument in school AfD's?--Isotope23 15:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SCHOOL and no apparent reason by it should be deleted. Pepsidrinka 03:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but a cleanup seems appropriate. --Jadriaen 04:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools. A major cleanup is required as the tone of the article is entirely unencyclopædic. (aeropagitica) (talk) 04:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but fun facts should be deleted --Tom Bonnie 05:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. High schools are inherently notable. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 05:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the good teachers giving out "donuts". Tyrenius 05:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the school. I threw out a lot of stuff, so hopefully others will look over the changes, and see if anything can be added back (with sources). --Rob 06:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Lots of high schools have block systems and school sports teams. There's nothing notable about this one. --Chaser 06:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clear precedence on high school inclusion, and while the article is not great, it is at least an article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. High schools are typically not notable unless they are the location of a significant event. Cedars 02:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this might be a bad faith nomination. Kdepa is a student at the school's main rival [1]. Metros232 11:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Schools are notable. DarthVad e r 13:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, all schools are notable. --Ter e nc e Ong 16:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The usual arguments regarding High Schools. — RJH 16:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, up for deletion due to petty rivarly, stupid tbh DannyM 19:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:SCHOOL. You read that correctly. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep High school. ReeseM 03:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems notable, and no clear reason has been given for deletion. Zaxem 11:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.